Miles Davis – Blue Moods

1. Nature Boy

2. Alone Together

3. There’s No You

4. Easy Living

In the ’50s, the party line among New York jazz critics was that hard bop was the “true faith” and that cool jazz was lightweight and unemotional. But Miles Davis knew better. The trumpeter (whose Birth of the Cool sessions of 1949-1950 proved to be incredibly influential) was smart enough to realize that cool jazz and hard bop were equally valid parts of the house that Charlie Parker built, and he had no problem working with cool jazzmen one minute and hard boppers the next. Recorded for Charles Mingus’ Debut label in 1955, Blue Moods is an excellent example of cool jazz. However, not all of the musicians who join Davis on this album were full-time members of jazz’s cool school. Although vibist Teddy Charles was cool-oriented, Mingus (upright bass) and Elvin Jones (drums) were never considered cool players — and the lyrical trombonist Britt Woodman was, in the ’50s, best known for his association with Duke Ellington. Nonetheless, the things that characterized cool jazz — subtlety, restraint, and understatement — characterize Blue Moods. Mingus and Jones were certainly capable of being forceful and aggressive, but you won’t hear them being intense on this disc; a very laid-back, gently introspective approach prevails on interpretations of “Easy Living,” “Alone Together,” “Nature Boy,” and “There’s No You.” Clocking in at 27 minutes, Blue Moods is quite skimpy by most standards — unfortunately, Fantasy didn’t have any alternate takes to add. But even so, Blue Moods offers considerable rewards to those who have a taste for ’50s cool jazz.

Blue Moods is 1955 album by Miles Davis. It brings Miles Davis together with Charles Mingus, accompanied by Elvin Jones on drums. The arrangement of “Alone Together” was by Charles Mingus, while the other tracks were arranged by Teddy Charles.

It was released on Mingus’s own Debut Records label. According to the original sleeve notes, the relatively short playing time of the album was because “the recording was cut at 160 lines per inch (instead of the usual 210 to 260 lines per square inch) making the grooves wider and deeper and allowing for more area between the grooves for bass frequencies […] and was deemed necessary to reproduce the extended bass range and give the listener more quality to that of high fidelity tape recording.”